Showing posts with label Place-Based Education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Place-Based Education. Show all posts

Sunday, 5 March 2017

Collaboration Elaboration: Evolving Together Toward a New Understanding of Reference Services

The general outlook of this blog assignment was to consider ways to "evolve" the practice of fellow teachers through collaboration with Teacher-Librarians. Looking at the Concerns-Based-Adoption-Model, or the Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition Model, are ways recommended to channel professional growth.  It seems implicit in these ideas, though, that many teachers are resistant to change, and that Teacher-Librarians, as potential leadership figures, have the answers.

However, I feel that all teachers are not very resistant. They are always adapting and adopting from year to year, but never moreso (in my approximately twenty years teaching) than right now. There has been a tsunami of change all at once to the education system, and teachers are rolling up the crests and plunging down the troughs of those waves of change admirably (despite 15 years of under-funding and cut services). And, as a Teacher-Librarian, I feel like I still haven't got my sea legs either, that I don't have all the answers, and that my practice is evolving weekly as well. Leaving tortured sea metaphors behind...where the Models mentioned above have a hint of a corporate management feel that rankles me a little, they are useful in that they suggest that someone can take a leadership role in helping colleagues through change.

And that is the strength of the Teacher-Librarian role: helping, being an instructional support. It's not so much leadership as it is acknowledging we are all having to change rapidly and being willing to be a partner who lends a hand. Not hierarchical leader/follower relationships, but side-by-side collegiality.

I find the real strength in the CBAM lies in these considerations:

...this model suggests the importance of paying attention to implementation for several years, because it takes at least three years for early concerns to be resolved and later ones to emerge. We know that teachers need to have their self-concerns addressed before they are ready to attend hands-on workshops. We know that management concerns can last at least a year, especially when teachers are implementing a school year's worth of new curricula and also when new approaches to teaching require practice and each topic brings new surprises. We also know that help over time is necessary to work the kinks out and then to reinforce good teaching once use of the new practice smoothes out. Finally, with all the demands on teachers, it is often the case that once their practice becomes routine, they never have the time and space to focus on whether and in what ways students are learning. This often requires some organizational priority setting, as well as stimulating interest and concern about specific student learning outcomes. We also know that everyone has concerns-for example, administrators, parents, policy makers, professional developers-and that acknowledging these concerns and addressing them are critical to progress in a reform effort (National Academy of Sciences).

Teacher-Librarian partnerships and team-teaching can ameliorate the overwhelmed feeling teachers have in those first three years of major change, can provide the time and space for reflection, and can help find new resources and new technologies to support classroom teachers.

We are in an era where there is an entirely new report card system being worked (MyEd BC having just replaced the already entirely new BCESIS, now scrapped), the style and focus of the entire curriculum has shifted, while which topics get taught in which grades has shuffled about, while publishers haven't yet fully created resources to match, and whole new subjects, such as Applied Design Skills and Technology, have been added (plus, remember DPA?) without there being anything removed, nor the days getting any longer.

So, how can Teacher-Librarians best help to "evolve" education practice?
A) By being a partner who is willing to initiate and organize much of the new explorations with colleagues.
B) By knowing the new curriculum well, anticipating resource needs, and by transforming the notion of what reference/research services are.
C) By finding ways in which technology can be used to help students find reliable information, credit sources responsibly, and share learning widely with authentic audiences.

Admittedly, this blog post is already doomed to run long. Thus, I will be focussing mainly on Part B above. I'll do this by imagining partnerships with two different teachers who want to tackle new elements of the curriculum in new ways.

Imaginary Chilliwack Teacher 1 is a Grade 3 teacher who now has portions of what used to be Grade 4 material in her Social Studies curriculum, namely a strong focus on Aboriginal cultures, with Content such as "Cultural characteristics and ways of life of local First Peoples..." (NEW CURRIC). She has concerns about being able to teach this meaningfully and respectfully without having much prior knowledge or experience.

The Chilliwack area, is the traditional unceded territory of the Sto:lo Nation. As a Teacher-Librarian with an interest in history and Place-Based Education, I know that there is a wealth of information about the Sto:lo available, but that it goes beyond the traditional form of reference and research materials. The options available are perfect for leaping into 21st century inquiry learning.

Sto:lo Reference materials:
A Journey Into Time Immemorial: an online virtual village experience jam-packed with valuable vetted information (requires Flash to play; doesn't work on ipads).
Sto:lo Sitel database on SD33 Sharepoint: short pages of information and images on traditional housing, hunting, weaving, stories, etc
Steqoye Classroom Workshops: teachers can book classroom visits in which Sto:lo members guide students through hands-on traditional and contemporary cultural practices such as cedar weaving, drumming and dancing, Halq'emeylem language, etc.
Archaeology Kit: brand new, originally designed for Gr 7, but I've used half the components with Gr 3 for incredible exploratory learning on Sto:lo fishing, weaving, tools, etc.
Lit Kits on Aboriginal themes: Smart Learning lessons tied to kits with various books and hands-on elements to pull Language Arts and Social Studies together (not specifically Sto:lo stories).
Longhouse Extension Program fieldtrip: all Gr 3 classes in the district will automatically go to this in the spring; includes sessions in the longhouse, with storytelling, plus a fishing information station, and a tour of the native plant garden.
Sto:lo Aurasma App Exploration: an interactive fieldtrip I created (with much support) as a "treasure hunt" at the Sto:lo Nation Resource and Research Management Centre; kids seek out, draw, and record information on various cultural artifacts while asking questions of the community members and research staff on site.

The above resources are a new breed of reference material. They allow experts to present information directly to students. They encourage students to be active in creating their own learning. They alleviate the pressure on the teacher to learn, assimilate, and create an entirely new "bag of tricks" resources to deliver the curriculum. As a teacher-Librarian, it is valuable to sit down with the teacher and present these options, map out a learning plan, arrange most of the bookings, and take the lead in teaching or presenting the material the first time around.

Now, let's look at Imaginary Chilliwack Teacher 2, who is a Grade 5 teacher, trying to address the newer, stronger Content focus on immigration and injustice in Canadian history: "Past discriminatory government policies and actions such as the Head Tax, Komagata Maru incident, residential schools, and internment camps" (BC Ministry of Ed, SS, Gr3). The imagined teacher may feel nervous about sensitively teaching these controversial topics about some very dark times in our history.

If I, as a Teacher-Librarian (who believes these social justice issues are essential to ensuring that Canada stays on a positive path), can help this teacher find and deliver resources to his students, we will both grow our practice together. And there are some stellar new-generation reference materials available here in Chilliwack, and a few others in development.

Immigration & Injustice Reference materials:
Chilliwack's Chinatowns Kit: one of a seriese of brand new local history resources created by district teachers collaborating with Chilliwack Museum staff; it is being field tested in classrooms now; it contains many primary source reproductions housed in an archive box with magnifying glasses and cotton resource-handling gloves.
The Writing on the Wall Outreach Kit: a Royal BC Museum resource about historical wrongs to the Chinese Canadian community; one kit is available for sign-out via the Chilliwack Museum; it contains a wealth of reproduced primary source documents.
Canadian Immigration and Injustices Lessons (work in progress): lessons I started developing last spring to help teachers (and myself); starting in late March, I'll be meeting with curriculum department members to develop some of these ideas into district kits.
Righting Canada's Wrongs textbook series: this incredible series highlights primary sources; titles include Japanese Canadian Internment, Residential Schools, and Chinese Head Tax; they will be included in district kits; we are also looking at ordering Jackdaws primary source reproduction folders (old-school T-L vertical files!) to add to kits.
Indian Residential Schools and Reconciliation: these resource guides, lesson plans, case studies, and primary sources collected/created by the First Nations Education Steering Committee are phenomenal; while I would focus mainly on the Gr 5 edition, supplements from the Gr 11/12 guides are applicable, too.
Residential Schools Writing Rubric: a standard assignment marking rubric I use with students, this one adapted to the residential schools team-teaching I did with a colleague in the fall.
Secret Path Kit: a local Lit Kit resource so new that it was presented as a workshop only a week ago; it's built around Gord Downie and Jeff Lemire's intense graphic novel about one boy's residential school experience (for which there is also an animated video, plus a CBC production for further enhancement).
A huge number of picture books and novels about the residential schools: books such as Shi-Shi-Etko, Shin-chi's Canoe, I Am Not A Number, When I was Eight, Not My Girl, Fatty Legs, etc, etc, all available in the Library collection.
General immigration books available in the Sardis Elementary Library.

Once again, the above resources are a new breed of reference material. They allow students to be active in creating their own learning by engaging with primary documents, often via hands-on exploration, to analyze the attitudes and intentions of the past. They help the teacher (and T-L) help alongside students as they "differentiate between intended and unintended consequences...," "take stakeholders' perspectives...," and "make ethical judgments about events, decisions, or actions..." (BC Ministry of Ed, SS, Gr5).  Again, as a teacher-Librarian, co-planning, ordering and organizing, and team-teaching these materials the first time around is a great way to develop together.

Further growth, transformation, evolution goals:
I still want to get to the Redefinition phase of the SAMR model in which...
"Computer technology allows for new tasks that were previously inconceivable. 
At this level, common classroom tasks and computer technology exist not as ends but as supports for student centered learning.  Students learn content and skills in support of important concepts as they pursue the challenge of creating [an end product using technology].  Collaboration becomes necessary and technology allows such communications to occur.  Questions and discussion are increasingly student generated." (Technology is Learning).

In the same vein, the Canadian Library Association includes this vital component of fostering 21st century literacies:
"Growth Indicator: Students construct and share new personal meaning using knowledge building technology tools" (Canadian Library Association).
Ideas for Using Tech Tools to Create and Easily Share Learning with Authentic Audiences

  • Use students as guest lecturers/experts: for example, in the fall, some Gr 5s wrote incredibly empathetic and thought-provoking essays about residential schools; they could present/read the essays to the next round of grade 5s learning this material; if the readings were recorded, the videos could be shared into the future; or, the students could turn their essays into voice-over for a slideshow housed on the Library webpage.
  • Have students collaborate on a wiki compiling important documents or images on an immigration/injustice topic so that it becomes a research repository for the future.
  • Have small groups collaborate on presentations using tech tools/apps such as Book Creator, infographic sites, Shadow Puppet, HaikuDeck, etc.; then, share the products out to family members, community members, classmates via a class or Library blog and invite feedback and questions.
  • Start students with images of historical moments/events with small amounts of details in captions, then send them on inquiry missions (after info-seeking lessons) to discover why these are important pivotal moments in Canadian history; they then report out to other groups so that each group teaches the other; consider doing this reporting out via share-able app creations, perhaps ThingLink would work best here to annotate photo elements rapidly.
  • Give student groups a primary source document to analyze it for bias, attitudes, implications, etc; have them snap a photo of it, upload it to Skitch, etc, and record their thoughts by highlighting and writing comments on the virtual doc; then present out to other groups.

These types of ideas above are the strategies I/we still need to work out at our school. We've tried some of them in pencil-and-paper format, and I've often used the apps in other ways, but haven't transitioned into these new tech-assisted versions. We are on our way, though. First, we've had to fully comprehend the new curriculum, then find more relevant, engaging resources, plus figure out the new reporting procedures in these early years of change. Now, I think we are ready to move beyond transforming our ideas of reference materials into transforming/evolving the ways in which students can present and share their learning. 

The near future is sure to be very interesting!



REFERENCES
this link will connect you to my references:




Saturday, 21 November 2015

Format Considerations for the Final Vision Project

WHAT FORMAT?
Now that I've considered the scope of, and the rationale for, my final vision project on Place-Based Education (that incorporates art and design, field trips, and tech tools), it is time to think about the format I will use to present that project.

My favourite tech device is my school iPad because of its compact, lightweight portability. I do nearly all of my work on this device, and it is my major teaching tool in the Library, so I will definitely be creating my final project on it. Also, I use the iPads with many different classes for many projects at school, so the more I play around with it the better I am able to use it with students.

I have some favorite apps that I like to use personally for my own work, and for projects with students. Those apps are Shadow Puppet, PicCollage, Book Creator (iBooks), and HaikuDeck.

As I recently realized/discovered, making an iBook is not such a good idea because it is not properly shareable for non-Apple devices. On the other hand, Puppet, PicCollage, and HaikuDeck are all very easily shared because they are web-based, so you can copy a link to the project and share it so that anyone with Internet access can see it.

MY PLATFORM:
I will be using HaikuDeck for my project. However, I will be sure to include examples of those other within my project, so that others can see their possibilities for use in Place-Based Education lessons and units. 

I'll try to show PBE samples/ideas for various elementary grades and subjects. 

HaikuDeck is a good app because it allows for creating a bit of an interactive feel, because you can create a dynamic slideshow with links out of the deck to other apps with more audio and video elements.

Haiku deck also has built-in sidebars to it slides which are great, unobtrusive spot to include References citations/links as you go, rather than placing them all at the end—or more conspicuously on top of your main slide.

CHALLENGES:
One challenge will be keeping the presentation short enough to keep people's interest, while being long enough to make the points well. 
Another challenge will be making sure the technology cooperates and creates live links, which will require quite a bit of double-checking. 
The presentation will need to include a variety of visual, audio, and video stimuli (not like this blog post or my last one). 
Another challenge will be including some sort of examples of Place-Based lessons that I have not yet done with a class, but have plans to do soon (nature art in situ with grade fives in a December field trip). 
If I want to use any student work samples, I'll need to seek both student and parent permission to include those samples; informing them that the project could potentially have a wide internet audience may be a deterrent. 
One particularly tricky challenge will lie in trying to include an example of how the Aurasma app works in the project I designed at the Stó:lö Nation site...

The nature of the final vision project I have in my head will need a sort of storyboard layout so that I can see where and how the various pieces fit together. 

Once I complete that, I'll be ready to go...



...several hours later...I think I've got things roughly mapped out...








A Rational Vs. Irrational Rationale Ramble

Caveat: 
I have been having a bit more difficulty planning this week's post. In thinking about the projected content for this Rationale focus, I have plenty of ideas about the Why of my final vision project on Place-Based Education—after all, those are the issues I've been concerned with for several months throughout this LIBE 477 course. But, I've already written extensively about the Why, so to do so again here seems redundant—especially since the Why will be the "main course" in whatever format I choose to present the project in very soon.
But, I think the real issue causing more writing/thinking blocks this week is the consideration of the Rationale around the Who question. Who is this final vision project for, or who could it potentially be useful for? Beyond the because-I-have-to-as-a-requirement-of-this-course reason, why am I going to make this final vision project? And since that is the area of discomfort, that is the area I'm going to force myself to focus on for this blog post.

So, without further ado and caveats, I show now finally truly begin.



The Rationale questions to I have asked myself this week are as follows:

1) WHY do I think it is necessary or desirable to deliberately incorporate Placed-Based Education (PBE) into teaching?
2) WHY do I feel the scope for increasing PBE must include my three priorities of A) art and design instruction, B) field (literally) trips out into local nature, or to local community resources, and C) the use of technology tools to record, present, and share student learning?
And,
3) WHO is this final vision project really for? Who is the audience? What is the intended reach?


As alluded to in the caveats at the top of the post, I will focus an awful lot on the answers to the why questions, numbers 1 and 2, when I construct the final project. WHO? is the question that matters right now.

I suppose I am doing this project, naturally, for myself first and foremost. When teaching, or being a Teacher-Librarian, it is best if you have thought about, and researched, and practised, and evaluated what you believe to be the main goals of education. I have really come to believe that Place-Based Ed is vital to making learning more relevant to students. I have come to believe that connecting them more to the place in which they live is a way to make them truly notice what we have around us locally so that they are willing to protect what is worth it, and fight to change what is wrong. I have a strong belief that incorporating art into all subjects, into every lesson possible, is a way to keep students self-regulated, while increasing creative thinking. I believe that teaching them about page layout and design allows students to think more flexibly and gets them to present learning in more striking ways by encouraging self-expression. I believe that using various technology tools to research and record learning, and then to present it and share it out, taps into vital 21st century literacy skills. And, I believe that using technology tools, such as iPad apps, to make presentations about what has been learned, is a way to extend the pencil/paint/etc-and-paper art and design skills into the technology realm—blending "analog" and digital art.

So, the project is for me: a way of solidifying my tenets and future directions.

And, of course, it is for my course requirements, and for my instructor. But, really, the value of the course is lies in the belief statements made above.

Another WHO that this project will be for is the small Personal Learning Network of my classmates in this online course. Hopefully, it will be of some interest or use to some of you out there (I know that I look forward to seeing what so many of you come up with).

However, it is thinking about WHO beyond the reach of this course could my final vision project be for that is the problem.... We are encouraged by the very design and the stated goals of the course to share widely, to put ourselves and our ideas out there into the ether for all to see and hear/read...(or to ignore—ha!). It still feels weird. But, I suppose I will tweet out links to the final project and see what happens. It could be interesting to receive feedback from other educators (if anyone sees it at all). 

Posting things far and wide still seems like an act of ego to me, even though I respect that it really is more about an act of sharing and generosity and connection for most ICT users. I do like, though, the idea that it could be the ultimate act of humble pie to post far and wide and hear nothing back—that has a dark humour that I like!

Closer to home, I suppose that I could create a final vision project that could be used as a presentation to my staff at a staff meeting. That makes me uncomfortable. I don't really lack confidence in front of an audience...but, I do feel discomfort about being/acting like some sort of education proselytizer. Maybe I just need to get over myself. I prefer having one-on-one discussions about my education beliefs over lunch in the staff room, or when sitting down to plan team-teaching units. Maybe I should push my self further. I will, at least, make my final project available to my colleagues via a link or attachment in a staff email so that they can access it if they choose.

Another possible way to share my final vision project would be with my local Chilliwack Teacher Librarians' Association. I would somehow feel a little less like a proselytizer in one of those meetings, I think. 

Could it ever be something that would be developed into a Pro-D workshop? My first instinct is to say, "No, definitely not interested in that." Probably due to a magnification of the who-am-I-to-be-proselytizing-to-all-of-you worries already mentioned. Within a course like this, it seems fine to work through your thought process "aloud" to an audience, because that's part of its purpose; it seems a different matter to formally present those thoughts as a pro-d workshop. But, I have talked to other people who have presented for the first time on a topic they are passionate about, and they felt the same way initially, but pushed through it and gave great workshops. So, perhaps, if I can manage to create something I'm happy with, I should not discount taking it that route (even though I am discounting that possibility even as I type that self-advice—ha!)

So ends my ramblings this week.





Sunday, 8 November 2015

Up PeriSCOPE!

Scanning the Possibilities for a Final Vision (21st Century Learning) Project.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Module #10 begins...now is the time to consider the Scope for my final project for the LIBE 477 course...was going to intro the ideas by talking about submarine trolling through topics, blah, narrowing the focus through the persiscope, blah, launching torpedos, blah—but, I'm really not a big fan of educational journey metaphors, so I'll just jump right in after letting these pictures stand in for a fleshed out theme:
 1  2
3


3 Creative Commons licensed images courtesy of  1) Tim Moreillon, 2) Marion Doss, and 3) Naval Surface Warriors


In choosing a final vision project, I decided to focus on an exploration of Place-Based Education. The place being British Columbia in the most general sense, and specifically Chilliwack, where I live, and even more specifically on the community of Sardis, where I teach at Sardis Elementary School. 

In most cases, I'll be focusing on Social Studies curriculum. I'll need to seek staff input on how to make other subjects include lessons on the Chilliwack/Sardis area.

In creating Place-Based Education lessons, I want to always be sure to add in these three key components:


A)  Art and design lessonsB)  Field trips out into nature, or to local community resourcesC)  Technology tools for researching, recording, and presenting        learning


The art and design component will include things like guided drawing, painting, drama, photography, page layout discussions, digital collaging, and so on. For field trips, we will ideally choose walking distance destinations (Sardis Park, Stó:lō Nation site) in order to cut down on bussing costs and environmental impact; for trips a little farther out, the goal should be to combine two or three locations into one all-day excursion (Rotary Vedder River Trail, Blue Heron Reserve, Cheam Wetlands). Before, during, and after the field trips, art should be created as a part of the learning process. The technology tools our students could use for learning and presenting include iPads and laptops to access internet research (plus text resources), and various apps such as HaikuDeck, Puppet, Piccollage, iBooks, ThingLink, etc.

                       


Things to consider as I move ahead...

Most of my personal teaching and ideas around Place-Based Education are specifically fitting in with the Social Studies curricula for various grades: I should eventually add Science, Math, etc; also look at integration of several subjects within one project.

Build on place-based successes already in my teaching repertoire, learn from and team up with other colleagues already doing PBE (purposefully, or not), and connect with and team up with anyone else interested on staff.

This final project should probably be presented as an iBook or HaikuDeck that links out to examples of Puppets, PicCollages, and ThingLinks showing the use of art/design lessons for place-based units in various subjects. Thus, my presentation becomes a showcase of the types of tools and ideas I'm advocating.

The final project almagamation will need to include references to materials I discovered throughout this course on the topics mentioned throughout this post.

Another think to think about is who I will present this vision for 21st Century learning to (beyond classmates) and how and when I'll do that. As part of my PLN online, with staff, with T-Ls...?


The circular and interconnected thinking process...
Now, in phase three of the course, I'm returning to the roots of my main interests explored at length in phase one of the course....
As usual, I like the big-picture approach, so I had a hard time separating out the different elements of Modules 10, 11, and 12 as I looked ahead--so, I planned them in tandem on paper...a bit of a linear mindmap (I always still rough my ideas out on paper in word doodles no matter how much I incorporate tech tools into my life). This is what it looks like: