Sunday, 26 March 2017

Digital vs. Print (vs. Emerging) Reference Resources: Theme Three Reflections

First of all, the goal of the last few weeks has been to make us, as Teacher-Librarians, aware of all of the specific reference resources available to help students complete research. Secondly, we have had to consider along the way the advantages, the disadvantages, and the availability of digital versus print versions of these resources. Of course, in an ideal world, we might have both types. Balance would be ideal.
Digitizing Can Free Up Shelf Space (Koterba)


With print atlases, encyclopedias, bibliographies, almanacs, and so on, the cost of maintaining up-to-date editions seems to be the main disadvantage. Everyone can agree that they are useful, but Library budgets are not always sufficient. The other issue that poses problems can often be a lack of physical space: multi-volume reference sets take a lot of shelf space, especially considering the (ridiculously) small size of some of the elementary school Libraries in this district.

This blog, from a public Librarian perspective deals with related considerations on weeding reference materials. I especially found one point very useful: you usually can't look at circulation statistics to evaluate reference resource usage because they don't typically get circulated; you have to have been in the building long enough to have seen whether or not they've been used (or go consult colleagues). Also, I agree with the sub-section entitled "Keep it in the Library, but Not in the Reference Collection" (M, Anna). I used that technique when assessing my reference area. Some excellent specialty encyclopedias (...of Dinsaurs, for example) that never got to be used by students got reshelved into their circulating subject area; so, too, did a few of the print atlases. Anna M also provides a list of her must-have essentials, which is interesting for comparison purposes.

Learning more about the deep/invisible web was certainly interesting. I knew about this concept but didn't fully understand just how much of the information on the web is not searchable using standard browser queries.
Why Isn't Everything Visible? (Rohail)
It made me appreciate even more that Chilliwack School District 33 recently listened to our Teacher-Librarians' Association and started subscribing to ERAC database bundles. Hopefully, we will be able to expand the offerings soon in order to reveal even more of the invisible content for our students.

The discussions of Wikipedia over the last few weeks have been thorough and illuminating. General consensus seems to have been that we should discontinue stigmatizing the use of this ubiquitous free resource, but that we should emphasize it as a useful general knowledge starting point; that it is good for providing background and vocabulary within a subject, but it isn't sufficient, or reliable enough, on its own. Showing students that the website itself acknowledges this would be advantageous:
Wikipedia Caveat, or Warning to Users (Content We...)

Here are a couple of things that I've been ruminating on the last couple of years, and especially throughout readings and discussions on this reference resources theme:

  • What counts as reference materials in the 21st century?
  • Do we need some rethinking on the reference needs of our Library communities?

This is a great video about changing reference needs in the community, or how to generate new seekers of interactive reference material. Nowadays, there is a transformation occurring within Library communities because Public Librarians and Teacher-Librarians are realizing that there are emerging, changing reference needs within our patrons. Increasingly, the DIY (Do It Yourself) movement has been driving people's desire to do more creative work on their own; yet, recent decades have seen less and less people learning simple mechanical, woodworking, gardening, sewing, and artistic skills in our society. Thus, Library patrons don't just need a book about these types of subjects, they often lack the costly tools and supplies needed to create the end product. In many cases, the amazing inquiry-driven Makerspace movement is fulfilling this need. Patrons can use the Library space, various art supplies, and various tools to create projects on site. The creation of the new BC education curriculum known as Applied Design, Skills, and Technology is a reflection of this developing reference need in our society (and is a surprisingly rapid addition/change to the education bureaucracy, which usually adapts much more slowly than teachers themselves!).

Many patrons, however, will want to create at home rather than in a Makerspace. This short documentary, Caine's Arcade, is phenomenal for showing the natural creative impulse inherent in children; it was the inspiration for a two-class, Grade 5 ADST building project in my Library in the fall; the two classes transformed the space into an old-timey midway/arcade and invited Little Buddy classes in to play to coincide with the annual Global Cardboard Challenge. Along the way, the makers came up with many different reference questions based on how they could best achieve their buiding goals: they researched ideas posted on the web.

There are myriad Youtube video tutorials and Pinterest pages and blogs supporting this DIY impulse, but, still, not everyone can afford to buy a sewing machine, a saw, etc to complete a possibly one-time project at home. More and more Libraries are responding to this need by creating a brand new type of loan category: A Library of Things.  I have been developing plans to create loan kits (including screwdrivers, etc, or art supplies, etc) to accompany various arts and crafts books in our school Library; these will hopefully "go live" next fall.

I'm curious to hear what other folks think about these new developments in the Library realm. Specifically, do you feel they actually qualify as reference needs or reference resources?



References

BC Ministry of Education,. "Building Student Success - BC's New Curriculum". Curriculum.gov.bc.ca. N.p., 2017. Web. 26 Mar. 2017.
"Content We Host, Terms Of Use - Wikimedia Foundation". M.wikimediafoundation.org. N.p., 2017. Web. 25 Mar. 2017.
Dougherty, Dale. "Dale Dougherty: We Are Makers". YouTube. N.p., 2011. Web. 26 Mar. 2017.
"Imagination Foundation – Global Cardboard Challenge". Imagination.org. N.p., 2017. Web. 26 Mar. 2017.
Koterba, Jeff. Cartoon: Digitizing Can Free Up Shelf Space. Web. 25 Mar. 2017.
M (full name not provided), Anna. "Tips For Weeding Your Reference Collection". Collection Reflection. N.p., 2013. Web. 25 Mar. 2017.
Mullick, Nirvan. "Caine's Arcade". YouTube. N.p., 2012. Web. 26 Mar. 2017.
Rohail, Widjan. Why Isn't Everything Visible. 2017. Web. 26 Mar. 2017.
"What To Expect From Libraries In The 21St Century: Pam Sandlian Smith At Tedxmilehigh". YouTube. N.p., 2013. Web. 25 Mar. 2017.

Sunday, 5 March 2017

Collaboration Elaboration: Evolving Together Toward a New Understanding of Reference Services

The general outlook of this blog assignment was to consider ways to "evolve" the practice of fellow teachers through collaboration with Teacher-Librarians. Looking at the Concerns-Based-Adoption-Model, or the Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition Model, are ways recommended to channel professional growth.  It seems implicit in these ideas, though, that many teachers are resistant to change, and that Teacher-Librarians, as potential leadership figures, have the answers.

However, I feel that all teachers are not very resistant. They are always adapting and adopting from year to year, but never moreso (in my approximately twenty years teaching) than right now. There has been a tsunami of change all at once to the education system, and teachers are rolling up the crests and plunging down the troughs of those waves of change admirably (despite 15 years of under-funding and cut services). And, as a Teacher-Librarian, I feel like I still haven't got my sea legs either, that I don't have all the answers, and that my practice is evolving weekly as well. Leaving tortured sea metaphors behind...where the Models mentioned above have a hint of a corporate management feel that rankles me a little, they are useful in that they suggest that someone can take a leadership role in helping colleagues through change.

And that is the strength of the Teacher-Librarian role: helping, being an instructional support. It's not so much leadership as it is acknowledging we are all having to change rapidly and being willing to be a partner who lends a hand. Not hierarchical leader/follower relationships, but side-by-side collegiality.

I find the real strength in the CBAM lies in these considerations:

...this model suggests the importance of paying attention to implementation for several years, because it takes at least three years for early concerns to be resolved and later ones to emerge. We know that teachers need to have their self-concerns addressed before they are ready to attend hands-on workshops. We know that management concerns can last at least a year, especially when teachers are implementing a school year's worth of new curricula and also when new approaches to teaching require practice and each topic brings new surprises. We also know that help over time is necessary to work the kinks out and then to reinforce good teaching once use of the new practice smoothes out. Finally, with all the demands on teachers, it is often the case that once their practice becomes routine, they never have the time and space to focus on whether and in what ways students are learning. This often requires some organizational priority setting, as well as stimulating interest and concern about specific student learning outcomes. We also know that everyone has concerns-for example, administrators, parents, policy makers, professional developers-and that acknowledging these concerns and addressing them are critical to progress in a reform effort (National Academy of Sciences).

Teacher-Librarian partnerships and team-teaching can ameliorate the overwhelmed feeling teachers have in those first three years of major change, can provide the time and space for reflection, and can help find new resources and new technologies to support classroom teachers.

We are in an era where there is an entirely new report card system being worked (MyEd BC having just replaced the already entirely new BCESIS, now scrapped), the style and focus of the entire curriculum has shifted, while which topics get taught in which grades has shuffled about, while publishers haven't yet fully created resources to match, and whole new subjects, such as Applied Design Skills and Technology, have been added (plus, remember DPA?) without there being anything removed, nor the days getting any longer.

So, how can Teacher-Librarians best help to "evolve" education practice?
A) By being a partner who is willing to initiate and organize much of the new explorations with colleagues.
B) By knowing the new curriculum well, anticipating resource needs, and by transforming the notion of what reference/research services are.
C) By finding ways in which technology can be used to help students find reliable information, credit sources responsibly, and share learning widely with authentic audiences.

Admittedly, this blog post is already doomed to run long. Thus, I will be focussing mainly on Part B above. I'll do this by imagining partnerships with two different teachers who want to tackle new elements of the curriculum in new ways.

Imaginary Chilliwack Teacher 1 is a Grade 3 teacher who now has portions of what used to be Grade 4 material in her Social Studies curriculum, namely a strong focus on Aboriginal cultures, with Content such as "Cultural characteristics and ways of life of local First Peoples..." (NEW CURRIC). She has concerns about being able to teach this meaningfully and respectfully without having much prior knowledge or experience.

The Chilliwack area, is the traditional unceded territory of the Sto:lo Nation. As a Teacher-Librarian with an interest in history and Place-Based Education, I know that there is a wealth of information about the Sto:lo available, but that it goes beyond the traditional form of reference and research materials. The options available are perfect for leaping into 21st century inquiry learning.

Sto:lo Reference materials:
A Journey Into Time Immemorial: an online virtual village experience jam-packed with valuable vetted information (requires Flash to play; doesn't work on ipads).
Sto:lo Sitel database on SD33 Sharepoint: short pages of information and images on traditional housing, hunting, weaving, stories, etc
Steqoye Classroom Workshops: teachers can book classroom visits in which Sto:lo members guide students through hands-on traditional and contemporary cultural practices such as cedar weaving, drumming and dancing, Halq'emeylem language, etc.
Archaeology Kit: brand new, originally designed for Gr 7, but I've used half the components with Gr 3 for incredible exploratory learning on Sto:lo fishing, weaving, tools, etc.
Lit Kits on Aboriginal themes: Smart Learning lessons tied to kits with various books and hands-on elements to pull Language Arts and Social Studies together (not specifically Sto:lo stories).
Longhouse Extension Program fieldtrip: all Gr 3 classes in the district will automatically go to this in the spring; includes sessions in the longhouse, with storytelling, plus a fishing information station, and a tour of the native plant garden.
Sto:lo Aurasma App Exploration: an interactive fieldtrip I created (with much support) as a "treasure hunt" at the Sto:lo Nation Resource and Research Management Centre; kids seek out, draw, and record information on various cultural artifacts while asking questions of the community members and research staff on site.

The above resources are a new breed of reference material. They allow experts to present information directly to students. They encourage students to be active in creating their own learning. They alleviate the pressure on the teacher to learn, assimilate, and create an entirely new "bag of tricks" resources to deliver the curriculum. As a teacher-Librarian, it is valuable to sit down with the teacher and present these options, map out a learning plan, arrange most of the bookings, and take the lead in teaching or presenting the material the first time around.

Now, let's look at Imaginary Chilliwack Teacher 2, who is a Grade 5 teacher, trying to address the newer, stronger Content focus on immigration and injustice in Canadian history: "Past discriminatory government policies and actions such as the Head Tax, Komagata Maru incident, residential schools, and internment camps" (BC Ministry of Ed, SS, Gr3). The imagined teacher may feel nervous about sensitively teaching these controversial topics about some very dark times in our history.

If I, as a Teacher-Librarian (who believes these social justice issues are essential to ensuring that Canada stays on a positive path), can help this teacher find and deliver resources to his students, we will both grow our practice together. And there are some stellar new-generation reference materials available here in Chilliwack, and a few others in development.

Immigration & Injustice Reference materials:
Chilliwack's Chinatowns Kit: one of a seriese of brand new local history resources created by district teachers collaborating with Chilliwack Museum staff; it is being field tested in classrooms now; it contains many primary source reproductions housed in an archive box with magnifying glasses and cotton resource-handling gloves.
The Writing on the Wall Outreach Kit: a Royal BC Museum resource about historical wrongs to the Chinese Canadian community; one kit is available for sign-out via the Chilliwack Museum; it contains a wealth of reproduced primary source documents.
Canadian Immigration and Injustices Lessons (work in progress): lessons I started developing last spring to help teachers (and myself); starting in late March, I'll be meeting with curriculum department members to develop some of these ideas into district kits.
Righting Canada's Wrongs textbook series: this incredible series highlights primary sources; titles include Japanese Canadian Internment, Residential Schools, and Chinese Head Tax; they will be included in district kits; we are also looking at ordering Jackdaws primary source reproduction folders (old-school T-L vertical files!) to add to kits.
Indian Residential Schools and Reconciliation: these resource guides, lesson plans, case studies, and primary sources collected/created by the First Nations Education Steering Committee are phenomenal; while I would focus mainly on the Gr 5 edition, supplements from the Gr 11/12 guides are applicable, too.
Residential Schools Writing Rubric: a standard assignment marking rubric I use with students, this one adapted to the residential schools team-teaching I did with a colleague in the fall.
Secret Path Kit: a local Lit Kit resource so new that it was presented as a workshop only a week ago; it's built around Gord Downie and Jeff Lemire's intense graphic novel about one boy's residential school experience (for which there is also an animated video, plus a CBC production for further enhancement).
A huge number of picture books and novels about the residential schools: books such as Shi-Shi-Etko, Shin-chi's Canoe, I Am Not A Number, When I was Eight, Not My Girl, Fatty Legs, etc, etc, all available in the Library collection.
General immigration books available in the Sardis Elementary Library.

Once again, the above resources are a new breed of reference material. They allow students to be active in creating their own learning by engaging with primary documents, often via hands-on exploration, to analyze the attitudes and intentions of the past. They help the teacher (and T-L) help alongside students as they "differentiate between intended and unintended consequences...," "take stakeholders' perspectives...," and "make ethical judgments about events, decisions, or actions..." (BC Ministry of Ed, SS, Gr5).  Again, as a teacher-Librarian, co-planning, ordering and organizing, and team-teaching these materials the first time around is a great way to develop together.

Further growth, transformation, evolution goals:
I still want to get to the Redefinition phase of the SAMR model in which...
"Computer technology allows for new tasks that were previously inconceivable. 
At this level, common classroom tasks and computer technology exist not as ends but as supports for student centered learning.  Students learn content and skills in support of important concepts as they pursue the challenge of creating [an end product using technology].  Collaboration becomes necessary and technology allows such communications to occur.  Questions and discussion are increasingly student generated." (Technology is Learning).

In the same vein, the Canadian Library Association includes this vital component of fostering 21st century literacies:
"Growth Indicator: Students construct and share new personal meaning using knowledge building technology tools" (Canadian Library Association).
Ideas for Using Tech Tools to Create and Easily Share Learning with Authentic Audiences

  • Use students as guest lecturers/experts: for example, in the fall, some Gr 5s wrote incredibly empathetic and thought-provoking essays about residential schools; they could present/read the essays to the next round of grade 5s learning this material; if the readings were recorded, the videos could be shared into the future; or, the students could turn their essays into voice-over for a slideshow housed on the Library webpage.
  • Have students collaborate on a wiki compiling important documents or images on an immigration/injustice topic so that it becomes a research repository for the future.
  • Have small groups collaborate on presentations using tech tools/apps such as Book Creator, infographic sites, Shadow Puppet, HaikuDeck, etc.; then, share the products out to family members, community members, classmates via a class or Library blog and invite feedback and questions.
  • Start students with images of historical moments/events with small amounts of details in captions, then send them on inquiry missions (after info-seeking lessons) to discover why these are important pivotal moments in Canadian history; they then report out to other groups so that each group teaches the other; consider doing this reporting out via share-able app creations, perhaps ThingLink would work best here to annotate photo elements rapidly.
  • Give student groups a primary source document to analyze it for bias, attitudes, implications, etc; have them snap a photo of it, upload it to Skitch, etc, and record their thoughts by highlighting and writing comments on the virtual doc; then present out to other groups.

These types of ideas above are the strategies I/we still need to work out at our school. We've tried some of them in pencil-and-paper format, and I've often used the apps in other ways, but haven't transitioned into these new tech-assisted versions. We are on our way, though. First, we've had to fully comprehend the new curriculum, then find more relevant, engaging resources, plus figure out the new reporting procedures in these early years of change. Now, I think we are ready to move beyond transforming our ideas of reference materials into transforming/evolving the ways in which students can present and share their learning. 

The near future is sure to be very interesting!



REFERENCES
this link will connect you to my references:




Sunday, 19 February 2017

Reference Services: Are We There Yet? (Theme 2 Reflection)

The Big Question:
In terms of the reference services journey for my school Library, I've had to ask myself, 
"Are we there, yet?" 
                          Laden, Nina and Adam McCauley, illustrator. Are We There Yet?. 1st ed. San Francisco: Chronicle Books, 2016. Print.              
                                                   Santat, Dan. Are We There Yet?. 1st ed. New York: Little, Brown, and Co., 2016. Print.
The Answer?
"No. We're on our way, but have a long way to go...at least the driver has a map now (or, Google maps, as the case may be)."


Reflections On Where I'm At and Where I'm Going
Theme 2 of the LIBE 467 course has had me fully evaluate reference materials and my performance in using and promoting reference materials with staff and students.
When I look at something like Joyce Valenza's Manifesto for 21st Century Teacher Librarians, I'm hugely inspired, but also massively terrified. A long way to go indeed!
The realities of time (and attempting to have a life outside the job) mean that we can't accomplish everything we aspire to in one year. Thus, it is necessary to have a longer-range plan. I tried to set myself a five-year plan. This was the school year where I was supposed to properly assess and work on my reference materials collection and promote information literacy via direct instruction and team-teaching. That is why I planned to take this course now. Putting reference and info-lit goals in year three of my plan was also timed to coincide with the second year of having ERAC digital database bundles available (in SD33) with the bugs worked out (it took more than a year to get all parties to agree to create one simple login/password combo for all of the databases, rather than the insanity of at least four different unmemorable combos).
The actual print reference materials in my Library have been whittled down to four small shelf sections. They were too outdated, neglected, and too costly to replace; plus, as I reinvigourated other collections (picture books, non-fic, novels, and graphic novels), I ran into space issues. The best solution seemed to be to start concentrating on digital reference resources.

My Goals for Reference Services and Resources
The goal over the remainder of this school year, and the first half of the next one will be to collate, annotate, and promote links to free high-quality online digital reference materials. I'll need to make a page on the Library site that does this efficiently. Part of my plan is to pitch this to my Chilliwack Teacher Librarians' Association on Monday afternoon. I'm sure we can get a committee together to work on this, especially in our districts after school collaboration sessions. Many hands make light work!
In the meantime, I'll continue my current mission to increase team-teaching around using the database bundles available to our students, teaching internet searching skills, and teaching the importance of crediting image sources (not just text sources). The fact that Genius Hour and similar inquiry movements are currently popular is really helping this goal along: more teachers are seeking me out now, rather than me going out and trying to connect with everyone.
It is indeed vital that we Teacher-Librarians lead the way in making sure that our students can find, interpret, and use information in an efficient and responsible way. I feel it is my responsibility to ensure my students do become information literate:
"The American Library Association (2006) describes information-literate individuals as 'those who have learned how to learn. They know how to learn because they know how knowledge is organized, how to find information, and how to use information in such a way that others can learn from them. They are people prepared for lifelong learning, because they can always find the information needed for any task or decision at hand.' The abilities to access, comprehend, use, and evaluate information have become the skills people must develop in order to function in our current world (Reidling, 7-8)."
                                      Comic found online: https://goo.gl/images/3suLIi
When looking at standards set out in Achieving Information Literacy, my Library is currently Below Standard for both print and digital reference material. I believe that I'll be able to fairly quickly upgrade the digital resources to Acceptable, and maybe even move toward Exemplary, in the near future given my goals mentioned earlier.
On the issue of print reference materials, though, I'm not so sure I'll even get to Acceptable due to the constraints that led me to shrink that collection down in the first place. Although, after I get my digital reference material straightened away, I might then be able to devote more of my budget to looking at getting the numbers of physical print reference materials into the collection. Yet, I really shouldn't do so unless I have a real plan to use them, and use them often. We do have to be wary of purchasing expensive materials just meet a standard, check off a box on a checklist, but then not actually promoting the relevant use of those resources; we don't want them sitting uselessly on a shelf.

                                                           Comicfound online: https://goo.gl/images/ZE4fGu


References:

Asselin, Marlene, Jennifer L Branch, and Dianne Oberg. Achieving Information Literacy: Standards For School Library Programs In Canada. 1st ed. Ottawa: Canadian School Library Association, 2003. http://www.accessola2.com/SLIC-Site/slic/ail110217.pdf

BCERAC. "Evaluating, Selecting, And Acquiring Learning Resources: A Guide". British Columbia Educational Resource Acquisition Consortium. N.p., 2017. Web. 29 Jan. 2017.

Kesler, Chris. "What Is Genius Hour?". Genius Hour. March 29, 2013. Web. 19 Feb. 2017. http://www.geniushour.com/what-is-genius-hour/


Reidling, Ann, Loretta Shake, and Cynthia Houston. Reference Skills For The School Librarian: Tools And Tips. 3rd ed. Linworth, 2013. Kindle e-book: http://www.amazon.ca/kindlebooks

Valenza, Joyce Kasman. "Manifesto For 21st Century Teacher Librarians | Teacher Librarian". Teacherlibrarian.com. October, 2010. Web. 19 Feb. 2017. http://teacherlibrarian.com/2011/05/01/manifesto-for-21st-century-teacher-librarians/

Monday, 30 January 2017

LIBE467 Reflections on Theme #1, Info Lit and Reference Services

As Theme #1 wraps up, there are some thoughts from the material that still resonate with me. These are the ideas or tenets that I feel are important, thus far in the course, to my practice or evolution as a Teacher-Librarian....

Physical/Text Reference Materials versus Digital Reference Materials?
This seems to be a common thread through the readings and discussions. In this digital age, how many actual hardcopy reference books should we have on our shelves? None at all? One of each? After all our explorations, plus my day-to-day experience in the Library, I tend to go with a stance that I'll continue to replace most physical reference texts with digital sources (assuming that I'll always first evaluate the digital source and choose it if I find it equal or better).

Why? Main reason = cost savings. Especially if the replacements are district database bundle subscriptions not paid directly out of my Library budget. Issues of keeping the resource current are usually solved with digital references because they are regularly updated, without the bother of having to buy a new physical text. Mainly very reliable digital reference materials are even free. Secondary reason = freeing up shelf space! Without multiple outdated reference texts and series, I have more room for other amazing non-fiction that will still support research (and pleasure reading).

I enjoyed reading about all of the considerations that can/should/do go into evaluating resources for inclusion in the Library, whether on real shelves or on virtual "shelves" of the Learning Commons. I do think that the reality is, naturally, that all of the weighing of authority, currency, and so on rarely happens as formally as filling in charts and checklists, but rather happens in the Teacher-Librarian's mind via rapid publication checking, page skimming, and a personal knowledge of the curriculum. However, it is valuable to slow down and think more slowly about our considerations at least once, as we are doing for Assignment #1. It is especially, potentially valuable to have done this as preparation for the event where a book in the Library gets challenged for supposed unsuitability; even if applied retroactively, taking this kind of formal evaluative process and applying it makes the justification clear. When there was a possibility of Richard Dawkins' excellent book, The Magic of Reality, becoming controversial a year or two back in Chilliwack, I read it, put it through the evaluation wringer and was delighted to find that met all criteria and then some. That allowed me to confidently put in on the shelf and promote it for science-minded kids.

Research Models and Info Skills Frameworks
In the section on the research process for students, I was glad to revisit the BCTLA Research Quest and Points of Inquiry models. I've tended to roughly have those in mind when embarking on research, but now am committed to using them more formally. I especially thought it was important to use and promote these locally developed models especially after such a bleak era of T-L cuts; as our recent court win comes into effect, I feel it's a good idea to highlight exemplary work from our field.

Instead of doing more impromptu database and Internet searching skills lessons, I'm trying this year to formalize them. To that end, I quickly created a Google doc that I can regularly add to and update for teaching those skills to students; I was using it the last two weeks. Now, in follow up blocks this week, I'll get to see how effective it was (or wasn't--yikes!). I know, though, that it is a regular part of the research process for students to hit a frustration barrier, so I'll need to re-teach the tips a little, I'm sure. It was a good to see reminders about frustration reflected in some of the research models.

Further goals for the end of this year, and into the coming year, are to formalize a set of research skills lesson, Internetiquette/digital citizen lessons, and Internet safety lessons appropriate to each grade. It's year three in my new Library; that's the time I set for starting these goals. The first two years, I had focussed on rejuvenating the collection, weeding, tons of new orders, connecting with the community, building bridges for team-teaching, and finding ways to support the new curriculum. Of course, all of these are ongoing concerns, but this vital core of Library--the info lit and reference services--needs to come to the forefront now.


Sunday, 29 January 2017

Evaluation and Selection of a Reference Resource: A Case Study

Here is a link to the original material, done as a Google doc, formatted a little differently:
http://bit.ly/2k6Lvds


Part 1
Exploring and Evaluating a Resource 
in the Current Reference Section 
at Sardis Elementary School

The Current Resource(s) Being Assessed: 
The Macmillan School Atlas, Third Edition (42 copies)
The Reader’s Digest Children's Atlas of the World (35 copies)
(both resources copyright 2000)

Personal Assessment Rubric to be used 
(an amalgam and simplification of many other rubrics)

Rating of 1 = Sub-par Resource =  This resource suffers from one or more of these problems: it is worn out, out of date, inaccurate, not engaging, not age or reading level appropriate,.........
It only remains because nobody has weeded it or because there is nothing to replace it. It really never gets used.
2 = Acceptable Resource =  This resource is adequate. It provides quick answers to ready reference questions. It contains material and/or back matter that assists with deeper research. However, it is a source that could be replaced by a more current digital version that would free up physical shelf space. It gets used occasionally but not on a regular, ongoing basis.
3 = Excellent Resource =  This is a popular resource regularly consulted for ready reference answers and/or research projects. It has engaging design and layout. It is at an appropriate reading level for the students. It is still well-bound and holds up well to frequent use. Although there are similar digital materials available, they don't surpass the usefulness of this print resource.

Standards To Be Assessed:
Purpose:

  • When these atlases get used, it is usually to quickly locate a particular country’s place in the world when a curious patron is in the Library. 
  • However, I have a number of globes in the room which are usually the more engaging “go-to” for this basic ready reference purpose. 
  • Sometimes they are borrowed and used by a class as a visual aid for students applying country labels or Canadian province labels to a blackline/outline map. 
  • However, that is rare; instead, teachers usually project an online map onto the screen in their class for this purpose.
(Score = 1)

Relevancy:    

  • One standard lesson with atlases used to be to teach about latitude and longitude. 
  • The rise of GPS technology in the last 20 years reduces the relevancy of spending large amounts of time on such lessons. 
  • The underpinning knowledge of latitude and longitude can be more effectively taught with digital tools; for example, explaining how and why their family car’s navigation system works would be more beneficial for students. 
  • The static flatness of the maps surely isn't as rich as 3D representations that must be available via tech tools. 
  • Also, in order to be comprehensive enough and legible enough, the atlases are in a large, thick, awkward size that is not easily portable (say for taking home in a backpack).
(Score = 1)
     
Currency:

  • The copyright date of these atlases is          
  • There have been many, many boundary and name changes in the last number of years; thus many pages of maps within are inaccurate. 
  • There are various front matter charts and maps on various topics which might be useful for ready reference questions and compare/contrast examinations between parts of the world—except for the fact that they are out of date by the end of the year of publication. 
  • Before the Internet explosion, we would have been happy to make do with old but comparatively recent information...but now? This level of outdatedness is unacceptable when we can get actual current information within five minutes of online searching.
(Score = 1)

Curricular Connections:      

  • If one ignores the lack of current content, or imagines this to be a 2017 publication, it would undoubtedly be a reliable source useful for meeting all kinds of geography curriculum needs. T
(Score = 2)

Efficient Use of Library Space:

  • The collection of 42 and 35 atlases takes up four entire shelf sections. They do not get used. I have been reorganizing shelves lately to gain more space; every shelf section counts!
  • Three years ago, when I started in this Library, I let a few more class sets go into classrooms (where they don't see much use).
  • We also have several other single volume atlases in the small Reference section.
(Score = 1)

Additional Evaluation Standards:
If I apply the Evaluation of Geographic Sources from Reference Skills For The School Library, the Macmillan atlas would certainly measure up to the standards of Publisher (Authority), and Scale, and Indexing (the Reader’s Digest perhaps a little less so). It would fail on Currency, as Reidling states, “A five-year-old atlas is considered historical” (Reidling 80). In terms of Format, this text atlas would technically provide good information quickly (if it was current), but a digital resource with a search window would be a far faster method of finding a map than flipping through an index, then flipping back through map pages.

Conclusion from Part 1: The Realization:

  • Using my rubric above, a true “keeper” resource really should score in the 12 to 15 point range; this one earns only 6 points. It earns sub-par status.
  • Perhaps for the occasional ready reference question occurring in the Library itself, it would be useful to keep one truly current atlas (not 77 outdated copies).
  • More often, the teachers in our school, and myself in the Library, are signing out the iPad carts for students to initiate database and online research. 
  • These devices are easily portable and allow students to find a cozy solo workspace to really engage and self-regulate (I have cushions and lap desks, too, to allow them to spread out in the Library). 
  • Thus, it would be beneficial to find an atlas app as a replacement reference resource.

Part 2
Selection of a Replacement Resource

Analysis of the National Geographic World Atlas App 
as a Replacement Resource

Standards To Be Assessed:
Purpose:  

  • This app meets all of the purposes described in Part 1, plus it is infinitely superior to projecting a 2D map image on screen.
Relevancy:

  • National Geographic is a thoroughly reliable, trusted source.
  • The rotating 3D globe image conveys a more realistic sense of location on the planet; plus, it helps convey some of the beauty of the planet.
  • It allows staff and students to zoom down to the level of an old-school paper street map with all rivers and main roads shown.
  • Having this app on an iPad makes for a very portable atlas.

Currency:  

  • This app was last updated in June 2015, yet the country files data comes from the CIA World Factbook, which often receives even weekly updates. 
  • The maps themselves are updated quarterly, which makes them extremely current.

Curricular Connections:   

  • This app is infinitely useful for meeting all curricular needs relating to the geography of our planet.
  • It even contains downloadable offline maps, plus a legend/key, and various statistical country comparison maps like a traditional text atlas (except these are clickable/zoomable).
  • When combined with some of the databases in district bundle, this would be an especially effective tool.
  • It contains fact files on every country in the world.
  • It allows switching between imperial and metric units.
Efficient Use of Library Space:

  • Purchasing this app would free up space taken by atlases on Library shelves.

Additional Evaluation Standards:   
If I apply the Evaluation of Geographic Sources from Reference Skills For The School Library, this atlas app would certainly measure up to the standards of Publisher (Authority); and National Geographic far more so than Reader’s Digest. The Scale standards being able to switch between imperial and metric is potentially useful. And in terms of Indexing, the ease of searching and clicking links within the app is intuitive and nearly instantaneous. The Currency varies from only a week old, to only a few months old: that is hard to beat. In terms of Format, this atlas app is very interactive, engaging, eye-catching, and portable.

Any Foreseeable Problems?: 

  • Many reviews as of the 2015 update talk about how it no longer allows one to zoom all the way down to actual street views as it once did (I have a vague memory of trying it out a few years ago and finding that level of zoom remarkable). 
  • The country information and statistics in the app come from the CIA World Factbook; I would prefer a less politically fraught source.
  • If our Internet access is down, we have no atlases.
  • What is the COST of this app? It is currently listed at $2.79; however, with our Volume Purchasing Plan, we can cut that cost down considerably (I still need to look into that). Even at the full rate times 30 iPads, that would only be $83.70 in total. Compared to the past purchase of 35 of the print Children's Atlas at $35.00, for a total of $1225.00, that is quite a savings (and the Macmillan cost $5.00 more per copy).

Conclusions from Part 2: The Decision:
The street view zoom-in is not our purpose (and as reviewers point out, Google, etc can do that better); our school need is to have a better version of a traditional atlas—which this is. 
Losing access to the Internet rarely happens in our school district since recent technology upgrades, so this app should remain consistently accessible. It would be wise, though, to keep one current text atlas in the Library collection.
If I apply my scoring rubric from Part 1, this app earns 3s across all standards.
I, myself, have had the app on my teacher iPad for three years. I use it multiple times each week with classes of various grades, especially when teaching history lessons. It is supremely useful for all of the reasons listed here above in Part 2.
The cost is not prohibitive. Especially when compared with replacement text atlases.
Buy the app! Install it on all school iPads, ASAP.



References:

Asselin, Marlene, Jennifer L Branch, and Dianne Oberg. Achieving Information Literacy: Standards For School Library Programs In Canada. 1st ed. Ottawa: Canadian School Library Association, 2003. http://www.accessola2.com/SLIC-Site/slic/ail110217.pdf

BCERAC. "Evaluating, Selecting, And Acquiring Learning Resources: A Guide". British Columbia Educational Resource Acquisition Consortium. N.p., 2017. Web. 29 Jan. 2017.


Central Intelligence Agency,. "The World Factbook — Central Intelligence Agency". Cia.gov. Web. 29 Jan. 2017. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/resources/the-world-factbook/

Daly, Ronald C and John R Waller. The Macmillan School Atlas. 3rd ed. Toronto: Gage Educational Pub., 2000. Print.

National Geographic World Atlas App. National Geographic, 2015. iPad app.

Readers’ Digest. Children's Atlas Of The World. 1st ed. Pleasantville, NY: Reader’s Digest Children's Publications, 2000. Print.

Reidling, Ann, Loretta Shake, and Cynthia Houston. Reference Skills For The School Librarian: Tools And Tips. 3rd ed. Linworth, 2013. Kindle e-book: http://www.amazon.ca/kindlebooks 

Sunday, 29 November 2015

HUZZAH! Final Vision Project on Place-Based Education FINISHED!

After much toil, I have completed my Final Vision Project for LIBE 477.

This course, and this project, have really helped me to focus my goals—my growth plan—for one major phase of my Teacher-Librarian position. I want to continue with, and build upon, Place-Based Education initiatives in my teaching and team-teaching.

(Building a stronger digital literacy and digital citizenship program around research projects is the second phase to begin focusing on now.)

My project can be accessed here:

Saturday, 21 November 2015

Format Considerations for the Final Vision Project

WHAT FORMAT?
Now that I've considered the scope of, and the rationale for, my final vision project on Place-Based Education (that incorporates art and design, field trips, and tech tools), it is time to think about the format I will use to present that project.

My favourite tech device is my school iPad because of its compact, lightweight portability. I do nearly all of my work on this device, and it is my major teaching tool in the Library, so I will definitely be creating my final project on it. Also, I use the iPads with many different classes for many projects at school, so the more I play around with it the better I am able to use it with students.

I have some favorite apps that I like to use personally for my own work, and for projects with students. Those apps are Shadow Puppet, PicCollage, Book Creator (iBooks), and HaikuDeck.

As I recently realized/discovered, making an iBook is not such a good idea because it is not properly shareable for non-Apple devices. On the other hand, Puppet, PicCollage, and HaikuDeck are all very easily shared because they are web-based, so you can copy a link to the project and share it so that anyone with Internet access can see it.

MY PLATFORM:
I will be using HaikuDeck for my project. However, I will be sure to include examples of those other within my project, so that others can see their possibilities for use in Place-Based Education lessons and units. 

I'll try to show PBE samples/ideas for various elementary grades and subjects. 

HaikuDeck is a good app because it allows for creating a bit of an interactive feel, because you can create a dynamic slideshow with links out of the deck to other apps with more audio and video elements.

Haiku deck also has built-in sidebars to it slides which are great, unobtrusive spot to include References citations/links as you go, rather than placing them all at the end—or more conspicuously on top of your main slide.

CHALLENGES:
One challenge will be keeping the presentation short enough to keep people's interest, while being long enough to make the points well. 
Another challenge will be making sure the technology cooperates and creates live links, which will require quite a bit of double-checking. 
The presentation will need to include a variety of visual, audio, and video stimuli (not like this blog post or my last one). 
Another challenge will be including some sort of examples of Place-Based lessons that I have not yet done with a class, but have plans to do soon (nature art in situ with grade fives in a December field trip). 
If I want to use any student work samples, I'll need to seek both student and parent permission to include those samples; informing them that the project could potentially have a wide internet audience may be a deterrent. 
One particularly tricky challenge will lie in trying to include an example of how the Aurasma app works in the project I designed at the Stó:lö Nation site...

The nature of the final vision project I have in my head will need a sort of storyboard layout so that I can see where and how the various pieces fit together. 

Once I complete that, I'll be ready to go...



...several hours later...I think I've got things roughly mapped out...